THE SMART TRICK OF AUDIT 177 4 CASE LAWS THAT NOBODY IS DISCUSSING

The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing

The smart Trick of audit 177 4 case laws That Nobody is Discussing

Blog Article

Также здесь представлены профилактических мерах, актуальных подходах и рекомендациях специалистов.

Online access to civil and criminal cases in choose circuit courts. Cases could be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.

Case files can also be accessed from the public access terminals within the clerk’s office in the court where the case was filed. 

Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

The ICAP Staff Service Rules, 2011 were framed by the respondent/Institute, these rules may not have the operates within a transparent legal and regulatory framework in the respondent/Institute. 14. In view of what continues to be discussed over, without touching the merits in the case, the preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition is sustained and the petition is held to be not maintainable in terms of Article 199 with the Constitution for the reason that non???statutory rules of service cannot be enforced through writ of mandamus in terms of ratio in the judgment passed from the Supreme Court during the case of Pakistan Electric Power Company supra. Read more

(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August 28th, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could likely pose a public risk. This case can also be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all foreseeable future public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite only one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found while in the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from here pollution and contamination is actually a right to life itself.

whether when granting promotion senior employees were considered for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its initial purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more

All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known since the Voice Case Information System, that allows callers to get fundamental case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to make use of and accessible 24 hours a day.

As a result, it absolutely was held that the right to the healthy environment was part from the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and fourteen of the Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all aspects of human existence, all these types of amenities and facilities that a person is entitled to get pleasure from with dignity, legally and constitutionally.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

It also addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and one hundred twenty in the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

P.C. for grant of post arrest bail should even be dismissed. Suffice is to observe that that considerations for pre- arrest and post-arrest bail are completely different. Reliance in this regard is placed on case legislation titled as “Shah Nawaz v. The State” 2005 SCMR 1899” wherein it's been held from the august Supreme Court of Pakistan as under:--

Report this page